Theology vs Theosophy

https://lesalazar.academia.edu

TRUTH vs. THOUGHT

According to the record of real time, in the year 1556 B.C. or the Adamic year of 2442, a baby was born to an enslaved Hebrew family in Mizr/Egypt which is in Africa and memorialized in the English language as a place of “Misery:..  This baby was rescued by a princess whose name is recorded in the Book of Jasher as Bathia.  She had gone down to the river for her Bath and there she heard the crying of a baby which so wrenched at her heart that she asked her maids to bring the baby to her.  This baby became known to the world as Prince Moses, the adopted son of the princess.  Bathia’s name can be deciphered as the Princess Sebatya, daughter of Senwosret I of Dynasty 12.  Needless to say, the dating of the Egyptian kings is a subject of debate because no heed has been given to the European historians of the 18th and 19th centuries nor to the claim of Eusebius that the first five rulers of Dynasty 16.were in fact ancient queens.  These queens can be found in the mythology of many nations which means that that list is corrupt with Mythological rather than Real Time.

As the adopted son of a Mesraite princess descended from Mizraim, son of Ham, Moses was expected to learn the extant religions of Mizr.  The word “Egypt” to designate the land of Mizraim was not yet in vogue.  The Princess Sebatya would also have been a priestess of the ancestral gods and aware of the hidden genealogies so that Moses’ early education was that of the secret wisdom taught by the Jano priests..  Like his forefather, Abraham, who saw design in the movement of the planets, Moses sought the Truth that only remained among his Semite brethren within scrolls hidden in temples in Egypt and Ethiopia and relayed orally to their succeeding generations.

“Blessed be the God of Shem!” so prophesied Noah.  (Gen.9:26)

At the age of 80, Moses, having been taught by the Jano priests, encountered the Eternal Being who was manifested in a burning bush to prove for all time that He was the Source of Life, both abstract and natural.  All theosophy and vain conjecture was stripped away.  Moses’ question to the unseen speaker was: “Who shall I say sent me?” Not What sent me; but Who.  The answer given was:

“I Am.”

All the attributes of Life which is Being; Eternal Motion; the Fire of Intelligence are bound up in this one descriptive name otherwise written as JAH.  It countered all the conjectures and philosophies of the ancients so that when Jannes and Jambres, sorcerer priests of the Pharaoh of the Exodus saw the man Aaron throw the dust of the earth into the air and it became lice, they knew for certain that they were in contest with the Creator of Earth, no longer dealing with contests of spirits of light and spirits of darkness – monads.  And so they admitted:

“This is the Finger of JHVH” (Exodus 8:19)

Some 1500 years later, Paul, the apostle of Christ Jesus confirmed that Moses had contended with two sorcerers, Jannes and Jambres.   It is to the works of these founders of ancient priesthood and schools of thought to which we must compare Theology with Theosophy

Who was Dzan?

Every book has a human author, whether inspired or not, so that The Book of Dzyan cannot be different.  The first indication of the name “Dzyan” is on the King List of Italy where Jano appears as its first king.  This first king/priest can be none other than Jano Pater otherwise known to the Japhethites of Europe as the abbreviated Yao or Yahoteph, the astronomer.  Originally, Janoshhip was handed down from father to son so that among the records of the people who became known as Chinese, we find the deeds of Tyras, son of Japheth under the name of Yao Ti.  The word “Jano” was used in the pre-Columban Atlantic as “Iannas” to indicate a priest. 

In The Book of Jasher, it is recorded that after a catastrophe a man of the house of Canaan, the son of Hivi, son of Hur went into the valley of Mt. Paran with his sons, one of whom was named Dishan.  This Dishan is a cognate of D.Zyan or D.Jan so that it would seem that Seir created another priest line from that of Jano Pater; yet based on his theosophy. 

According to this Book of Jasher aka The Book of the Righteous, there was a Nimrod, that is, an earth ruler or high lord who was born in 2100 B.C. and was killed by Esau, son of Isaac and Rebecca in 1885 B.C.  Esau, called Edom, coveted the clothes of this Nimrod and took them, thereby assuming his mantle. (Jasher, Cap.27)  This pontiff may then be found in Dynasty III, bearing the high crown of overlordship, called Sanakte.  Scholars do not know where to fit him; but The Book of Jasher places this man as Angeas, high king over all Africa in the days of Joseph.  “Angeas” is a cognate of “Sang.Ti” which is in itself a clipped cognate of Sanakte..  Moreover, in ancient Sumer a priest was called a “Sangu”; and to this day there are tribes that continue to worship Shango.

King Solomon in the Book of Ecclesiastes refers to these writings of the Righteous when he wrote of himself as a preacher:

“The Preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was written was upright, even words of truth.”:

What is Truth?

Between 1486 B.C. and 1445 B.C. Moses wrote the Book of the Law which exalted the God of Creation, the Prime Mover, the Duality in Unity of Supremacy, the Almighty Elohim who created humans from clay, moulded to grow in the likeness and character of the Creator through the Divine Essence that would be offered.

In A.D 27 or A.D. 31, a Roman official called Pilate asked of a man who was being interrogated: “What is Truth?”  That man, who was seen as the answer to the first prophecy of a Redeemer Messiah given to the First Woman had already answered the question in speaking to His disciples when he said:

“I am the Way, the Truth and the Light.”

Truth is an Absolute.  However, there can be many perceptions or strands of truth which have to be tied together in order to find the Truth. That is what courts of law were for, not public opinion

In quoting from the the Book of Dzyan, Helena Blavatsky admits to an “eternal, yet omnipresent, without beginning or end…”  However, the sentence does not end there.  Added on is; “periodical in its regular manifestations between which periods reign the dark mystery of non-Being…”  So just what are we looking at?  When does non-being occur?  Who was present to view this phenomenon?

Moses, the man who spoke face to face with the Everliving One in the first words of Genesis contends with the Secret Doctrine when he said:

“In the beginning Elohim created the heaven and the earth.”  (Genesis 1:1)

“And Elohim said: “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness…” (Genesis 1:28).

The word “Elohim” is a uni-plural word like “Family” or “Kingdom” and in the original Hebrew of Shem, it indicates The Almighty.  Therefore, inasmuch as “theoi” or Theos was used by the Greeks steeped in the ancient doctrines of created gods, it is best when we see the word ‘God’ stemming from worship of Bel Gad, Lord of Accad, that we restore it to the Hebrew language.  Hence, the shortened form of JHVH being JAH – Everliving “I AM” would be best used in the Greek translations of the Testimony of Jesus Christ:

John the apostle of Jesus Christ of Nazareth removes this dark mystery referred to by Blavatsky with: an expansion of the first words of Genesis:

“In the beginning was the Word (Greek: Logos) and the Word was with JHVH and the Word was JHVH.  The same was in the beginning with JHVH”. (John 1:1-2)

John further relates the imminent Return of the Redeemer when he was commanded to write the Book of Revelations:

“…and His Name is called The Word of God.” ( Rev. 19:13)

The Word of God is not an abstraction or an anthropomorph created by human imagination, but according to the witnesses to the human life of Christ Jesus, it was understood that the Creator emptied Himself of Divinity in order to become a Man obedient to the Divine Law who through his perfect Life and His shed Blood might redeem His purpose for Mankind, made in His image, to grow into His likeness, eventually to cast off Mortality and be clothed in Immortality as adopted Sons and Daughters of the Kingdom of Elohim.

This Theology is in direct opposition to that of Theosophy which is based on the writings of Dyzan and other teachers of lawlessness who distracted the masses with sorcery and myths in order to maintain respect and control for themselves and kin.

It is noteworthy that at the time of Helena Blavatsky’s popularity among the educated elite that another woman, Ellen White, saw clearly that knowledge of events past, present and future were bound up in the Holy Bible and obedience to the Creator’s Law of Liberty.

----

Contents